Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
- saxophonias
- Posts: 2592
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:03 am
Re: Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
Nice! The shorter the better
Re: Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
Just curious,
The D14 has a bore of 75mm and a stroke of 79mm, correct me if im wrong. I've heard that if you make the bore 79 you can reach more hp due to more revs?
How does it work?
The D14 has a bore of 75mm and a stroke of 79mm, correct me if im wrong. I've heard that if you make the bore 79 you can reach more hp due to more revs?
How does it work?
D14A3-OBD1-I/H/E
126 hp /145 Nm
126 hp /145 Nm
Re: Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
yes because the displacement will increase.
but i don't know if the sleeves will afford this
but i don't know if the sleeves will afford this
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:06 am
- Location: Belgium
Re: Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
The bore diameter is closer to the stroke ,which gives a more square engine and those are easier to rev.79mm isn't possible without sleeves.And even with sleeves you'll have sealing issues.
Last edited by hondaNickx on Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Quote from Endyn:"The combustion chamber is a better shape than the DOHC.So don't chunk those 1.6 SOHC engines, they can make really good power. For a pure performance application, regardless of application, I'd choose the SOHC. No bull!"
Re: Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
So close to 79 (almost square) is more feasible?
D14A3-OBD1-I/H/E
126 hp /145 Nm
126 hp /145 Nm
- mynameisowen
- Posts: 1307
- Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:38 am
- Location: London or Oxford, England
- Contact:
Re: Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
why does it make it easier to rev exactly?? is just because it is better balanced?? so less energy loss making it easier to rev??hondaNickx wrote:The bore diameter is closer to be stroke ,which gives a more square engine and those are easier to rev.79mm isn't possible without sleeves.And even with sleeves you'll have sealing issues.
1996 EJ9 Civic
1998 BB8 Prelude Motegi VTi
1998, B16A2 EK4 Civic VTi
Aims:
EJ9 - Now my GF's car.
BB8 - Rebuild after crash damage to front end.
EK4 - Daily driver. Strip and track prep once prelude project complete
1998 BB8 Prelude Motegi VTi
1998, B16A2 EK4 Civic VTi
Aims:
EJ9 - Now my GF's car.
BB8 - Rebuild after crash damage to front end.
EK4 - Daily driver. Strip and track prep once prelude project complete
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:06 am
- Location: Belgium
Re: Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
Yes indeed , try looking at it like a circle and a oval .They both will turn around but the circle will turn around with less effort and will therefore be easier .The oval promotes torque ,the circle promotes top end.
Quote from Endyn:"The combustion chamber is a better shape than the DOHC.So don't chunk those 1.6 SOHC engines, they can make really good power. For a pure performance application, regardless of application, I'd choose the SOHC. No bull!"
- Dodo Bizar
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2009
- Joined: Mon Jun 22, 2009 10:36 pm
Re: Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
Uh... maybe I am missreading something but:
Just increasing the bore will only get more stresses (hence the sleeves). Having a square displacement compared to an engine with a longer stroke but same displacement... yes, the square is safer to rev. But that's not out case at hand.
We are talking about enlarging our 75mm to 79mm aint we? That wont allow for higher revs since we would be talking about seriously more mass to move around the same track, and much sooner piston/rod failure. And 79mm bore means 1550 cc if I am correct! Actually very close to B16 specs aint it?
Or are we talking gasdynamics? Then I should shut up and listen .
Just increasing the bore will only get more stresses (hence the sleeves). Having a square displacement compared to an engine with a longer stroke but same displacement... yes, the square is safer to rev. But that's not out case at hand.
We are talking about enlarging our 75mm to 79mm aint we? That wont allow for higher revs since we would be talking about seriously more mass to move around the same track, and much sooner piston/rod failure. And 79mm bore means 1550 cc if I am correct! Actually very close to B16 specs aint it?
Or are we talking gasdynamics? Then I should shut up and listen .
-
- Posts: 713
- Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:06 am
- Location: Belgium
Re: Piston and rod size of the D14A3/A4/Z1/Z2
I think it was in theory ... ?In practice you won't be able to run 79mm bore or only for a very short period.Bisimoto made a 80mm D15 a long time ago but that blew up on the dyno because of sealing issues.78mm with sleeves is the max you can go on a engine that runs more then just a couple of drag races a year.The engine does infact breath better and is more square ,and normally in these kind of engines you would use forged pistons and lightweight flywheel.B16a And B16B engines are over square ,some K engine are square and all D-series engines are under square.
The R/s ratio is what helps the D14 a great deal to survive these kind of builds.Luckly the D14's R/s ratio is perfect and right in the middle.I think because of that great R/s ratio it survives those turbo builds that are running 200Nm of torque and 180-200chp on a stock bottem end.
The R/s ratio is what helps the D14 a great deal to survive these kind of builds.Luckly the D14's R/s ratio is perfect and right in the middle.I think because of that great R/s ratio it survives those turbo builds that are running 200Nm of torque and 180-200chp on a stock bottem end.
Quote from Endyn:"The combustion chamber is a better shape than the DOHC.So don't chunk those 1.6 SOHC engines, they can make really good power. For a pure performance application, regardless of application, I'd choose the SOHC. No bull!"